This is an open reply to the Massachusetts Trial Court's call for comments regarding its Proposed Uniform Rules on Public Access to Court Records. It is the joint comment of the undersigned individuals and organizations. Additional materials and pledges of support can be found in relation to individual signatories.† It was submitted to the Public Access to Court Records Committee on May 4, 2016.
Public Access ⇒ Data Standards + API
Given that the adoption of a common data standard for the Massachusetts legal community offers the promise of increased efficiency, lower information sharing costs, and improved access to courts, we propose that the Massachusetts Trial Courts adopt a set of data standards to facilitate sharing information between the Trial Courts and other stakeholders, and that all data deemed publicly available be made accessible in a machine readable format consistent with these standards via an application programming interface (API) overseen by the courts. This would supersede the need for the Courts to create idiosyncratic user portals for various stakeholders, as described in Rule 5. It would also simplify the procedures described in Rule 3 as the use cases envisioned could be conducted over the API.
Signatories
Alphabetical by institution or last name. Institutional support in bold.- Matthew R. Segal, Legal Director, ACLU Foundation of Massachusetts (@ACLU_Mass)
- Heidi Alexander (@heidialexander), attorney and law practice advisor, BBO No. 677212
- Steven M. Ayr, BBO No. 673221
- Katrina Brundage (@KBrun13), Data Scientist & Legal Analytics Consultant.
- Pamela S. Chestek, BBO No. 647124
- David Colarusso (@colarusso), attorney and data scientist, BBO No. 683292
- Daniel Saroff, Chief Information Officer, Committee for Public Counsel Services (@CPCSnews). In addition to the reasons laid out in these supporting materials, we as an institution would be available to help with the implementation of the above, providing consultation on data standards and constructing open source tools to interact with a court API.
- Marc Dangeard, consultant working on bringing the world to agreement at CommonAccord
- Tom Druan (@druanip), intellectual property attorney, BBO No. 674178
- Brian Focht (@NCCyberAdvocate) attorney and technology consultant & blogger
- Kenneth A. Grady, lean law professor, author, speaker.
- Sam Harden (@samuelharden), attorney and founder of MyCourtCase.org
- James Hazard - BBO No. 227347 (inactive)
- Matt Henry (@heymatthenry), public defender and former software developer.
- Brandon Hudgeons (@bhudgeons), COO and VP Technology, Schoox, Inc.
- William Li, Fellow, Harvard Berkman Center for Internet and Society
- Joe Mornin, software engineer and attorney.
- Tanina Rostain (@TaninaRostain), professor and founder Georgetown Iron Tech Lawyer program, Georgetown Law Center.
- Eva Shang (@eva_shang), Harvard student, co-founder of Legalist
- Suffolk University Law School (@Suffolk_Law).
- Gabe Teninbaum, (@GTeninbaum)Professor of Legal Writing; Director, Institute on Law Practice Technology & Innovation; Director, Legal Technology & Innovation Concentration; Suffolk University Law School.
- Gyi Tsakalakis (@gyitsakalakis), attorney and technology services provider
- Ryan Wold, Software Engineer, Service Designer, and former Public Servant
- Adam Ziegler - attorney (BBO #654244)
† In recognition of the fact that signatories might have different rationales for recommending the above, we allow them to selectively sign on to and provide additional supporting materials. When appropriate, these are linked to from their signatures.